| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Scout Lady
Guest
|
 Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Better to have a Schipperke or John Weatherly? You decid |
 |
|
"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> ranted in message
news:db6ma45qneh7mjqae477t9bh6silscp0h6@4ax.com...
| Quote: |
God is EXTREMELY concerned that everyone know where I was stationed,
when, and what sorts of birds I worked on!! |
|
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Better to have a Schipperke or John Weatherly? You decid |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:58:35 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | On Aug 18, 4:53 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
I keep waiting for you to -- in some way-- show us God's love, the
Holy Spirit in you; I'm still waiting.
What I keep seeing is anger, hate, rage. Not the Holy Spirit by any
means.
Tried that with you many times over, John.
|
?????? ^ ^ ^ ^^ A list of us have never noticed! ^ ^ ^ ^ ???
Like you LYING and going into a RAGE about the Metropolitan Baptist
church; then you found out you were WRONG, and not a WHISPER of an
APOLOGY.
^ ^ ^ ^ That was Christianity in Action if ever there was!
Like your going on like it was the most important thing since Nuclear
War about where and when I was stationed!
Monumentous stuff! To be sure!
God is EXTREMELY concerned that everyone know where I was stationed,
when, and what sorts of birds I worked on!! Earth-shaking stuff!
What YOU need, what you foam at the mouth over, are
1 attention
and
2 being right about EVERYTHING
(if you're not right, you'll DIE, you know!)
Your responses didn't
| Quote: | change. Fact is, it doesn't matter how one deals with you, you will
still be the same huge jerk you always have been.
|
Everybody knows how I am;
trick is, now everybody knows how YOU are!
"Mission accomplished." Rev Kelly Siebecke, Lez pastor
extraordinary! strikes again
| Quote: |
Oh, wait...I should have said "the same 'little' jerk you always have
been".
|
Honey, I have never claimed to be "tall.' I am of average height.
So what?
I MANY years ago stopped worrying about how tall I'd get; I also
YEARS ago stopped worrying about the size of my penis. "It does the
job."
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:27:44 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:48:25 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:38:30 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
DOC wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:07:07 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com
wrote:
You have seen me give accurate information about Insane Elaine
MANY times, but due to your TOTAL lack of character, you remained
silent. (that's the same as lying, slug slime.)
Name ONE time you ever 'gave accurate information about me',
liar-johnnie?
A few quotes of yours:
"You HAVE abused your patients" [lie, and libel]
"You're a knowb animal abuser" [lie, and libel]
"You are a criminal" [lie, and libel]
You are a thief" [lie, and libel]
Need any more reminders, short bus?
Gosh, Doc, you sure ask some dumb questions ;)
I just posted some text where johnnie said he was and was not
programmer within a few lines in the same post.
Four days later he denied saying it.
I can't help that you're too stupid to understand me.
" Well, there was the PRIME I worked on. I programmed and wrote the
online Menu system for a PRIME computer.
And, stupid person, as I said before, if you call using the "pig
latin" version of UNIX "programming," fine. I was a programmer.
I don't call the "pig latin" version of UNIX (it was called "PRIME"
back then) "programming."
If you want to call that language SUBSTITUTE (you probably know the
name of the "pig latin" version of PRIME, if you thought about it)
If that's what you want to call "programming," OK!
According to you, I was a programmer for several months.
Absolutely ABSURD.
And as I have stated UNIX was not used on Prime computers.
|
Oh? Well, pal, as I have stated, I don't read your every word. So
this is the first time I've seen that statement.
And I called it "UNIX" as a generic term. I'm aware that the PRIME
was BEFORE the UNIX, and that the UNIX was based on the PRIME
language.
As usual, you get hung in the minute DETAIL when I'm trying to get to
a point.
I'll say, "aren't those roses beautiful." You'll say, "those aren't
roses."
I'll say, "ok. But they're still pretty, aren't they?"
You'll say, "they aren't roses."
I'll say, "FINE! But aren't they pretty?"
You'll say, "they aren't roses! But if you think THEY're pretty you
should see..."
You just won't answer with a simple "yes" unless it's worded
PRECISELY to your liking.
You want others (me ) to "play nice", but you won't. (play nice)
Whatever the language was used on the PRIME, I was using a
"short-cut" version, but I was able to "program" the menu on the
computer.
I worked with the system programmer, he would give me a hint or two
as I worked, and I "programmed" the menu.
No big deal. I didn't work on any FUNCTION other than the menu.
Why they would hire me (a WRITER) to program the menu, I have no
idea.
| Quote: |
I also worked on/co-authored, edited, and "bug-fixed" a VAX computer
at Sundstrandt, which became GE DOD systems. (or some such)"
" Not being a programmer, I have never worked on documenting or
finding bug fixes."
(You really should wait until Google removes your posts before
making claims like this.)
|
Yawn
| Quote: |
You should remove your head and shoulders from your colon (get your
head out of your ass) before you attack people for saying things you
can't understand.
I've quoted him, been called a liar for making things up and had to
post the link where he said it.
Johnnie was *adamant* about his Book of Mormon dates and when I
proved him wrong,
You haven't proved anything.
claimed he didn't remember the right date.
I guessed at a date. I didn't remember, because I didn't notice the
date at the time.
You should have said that when you gacve us specific dates for your
imagined changes.
|
^ ^ ^ ^ "suit yourself."
Does it occur to you, stupid person, that I thought I was right at
the time?
You are constantly pointing out how "differently" my brain works,
but when it comes to YOUR issues, you expect me at 10,000 %
How does that work, exactly?
You know what an arrogant, buffoon, self-important JERK you are?
I don't dance to your tunes, and I don't hang from strings you
hold.
And any time you don't like my presentation, you are invited to go
have sex with yourself.
I doubt that I'll miss you.
| Quote: |
I didn't give you "specific dates", liar. I GUESSED, and said so.
IF you said so it was well after my showing you that the dates you stated
were wrong.
|
Yeah. So? So I didn't notice your "input" immediately. I have a
life, and you haven't been EXACTLY friendly.
| Quote: | ***************************************************
"Well, at least this should be an easy one for you to "prove". All you need
to do is get a copy of the BoM edition which has 'Bethelem'[sic] replacing
'Jerusalem', state which edition it is, and scan the relevant pages.
John replies,
" ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^Done, done, done, and done.
|
Perhaps, just PERHAPS, I didn't entirely DIGEST your comment before
responding.
And as you continue to be a horses's ass, I'm going to reply to fewer
and fewer.
I mean, this "argument" is getting VERY old. It's growing cobwebs.
But you will be right if 10 people have to die to prove it!
And that's all the time of mine you get to waste for today.
You, like a few other psychotic haters in here, LOVE to rehash.
Most of us don't.
SNIP |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
john w
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:12:54 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:35:06 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
.
And, like Al Capone, if you don't declare the income, you can go to
jail.
?? ^^^ LOL!! You are now comparing me to Al Capone?
Only in one respect as he was an intelligent man.
|
Ouch! I believe you just put me down! And that's without you even
seeing my IQ test scores!
:-(
I mean, if I can't find a way to win your approval, I'll just DIE!
:-(
| Quote: | Thery sent him to jail for not declaring income.
|
Yeah, that $.50 he got paid for shining shoes, got him 10 YEARS.
As far as IRS is concerned, my $75 twice a year (or so) is hardly
what they "come after you" for.
But you keep believing otherwise, and-- by ALL means-- contact IRS
and SSI or SSDI about me.
snicker.
| Quote: |
ANY brain, ANY sense I had given you before now,
Whoooooooooooooooosh! It'd gone.
-------------------------- ARCHIVED -----------------------
If you had a BRAIN (you don't), your next OBVIOUS question would
have been,
"How can you make any money if you are only getting $75 to build a
computer?"
Well, it's $75 I have that I wouldn't have if I hadn't built it.
" But, why would ANYBODY build a computer for $75 profit?"
It's fun, and it's something to do that keeps me out of here and
away from self-worshipping MORONS like you.
But clearly it does not as you are here.
|
(don't open my posts)
| Quote: |
On top of all that, I get PAID to have fun!
:-)
And all you can think about is, "Did you report that $75 you made 6
months ago? "
If IRS isn't concerned (they aren't), you don't need to be concerned.
I'll take care of MY behind; you worry about your behind.
It's the law but again, thanks for playing. The next time a person
interested in Christianity comes along we can point him to you.
He'll end up saying what my father always said. "I've seen to many
Christians."
|
I have never called myself "perfect." I have never called myself "a
perfect Christian." I don't know any of those.
I wouldn't want to.
The only perfect person I know at the moment would be... Hmmm...
You.
| Quote: |
And you've used up your 2 minutes.
SNIP |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
ujb
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Better to have a Schipperke or John Weatherly? You decid |
|
|
john w <j wrote:
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:58:35 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
On Aug 18, 4:53 pm, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
I keep waiting for you to -- in some way-- show us God's love, the
Holy Spirit in you; I'm still waiting.
What I keep seeing is anger, hate, rage. Not the Holy Spirit by any
means.
Tried that with you many times over, John.
?????? ^ ^ ^ ^^ A list of us have never noticed! ^ ^ ^ ^ ???
Like you LYING and going into a RAGE about the Metropolitan Baptist
church; then you found out you were WRONG, and not a WHISPER of an
APOLOGY.
|
please papa porn!
| Quote: | ^ ^ ^ ^ That was Christianity in Action if ever there was!
|
as is looking for hookers
| Quote: | Like your going on like it was the most important thing since Nuclear
War about where and when I was stationed!
|
hahaha
| Quote: | Monumentous stuff! To be sure!
|
so scrambled, so stupid
| Quote: | God is EXTREMELY concerned that everyone know where I was stationed,
when, and what sorts of birds I worked on!! Earth-shaking stuff!
|
I know if you forget again, and "work" is a stretch!
| Quote: | What YOU need, what you foam at the mouth over, are
1 attention
and
2 being right about EVERYTHING
(if you're not right, you'll DIE, you know!)
|
she has a better track record for being right than you papa porn....
big cut
--
I'm sweet sweet, and I approve this post... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:48:25 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
| Quote: |
(You really should wait until Google removes your posts before making claims
like this.)
|
That's why so many of us go ahead and archive first. That way, the
old crud cannot deny what he really said, because he have the proof.
He's not very bright in not archiving! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:35:00 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
You haven't proved anything.
|
The term is PROVEN, and yes he HAS. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:38:30 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
| Quote: | DOC wrote:
On Tue, 12 Aug 2008 07:07:07 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
You have seen me give accurate information about Insane Elaine MANY
times, but due to your TOTAL lack of character, you remained silent.
(that's the same as lying, slug slime.)
Name ONE time you ever 'gave accurate information about me',
liar-johnnie?
A few quotes of yours:
"You HAVE abused your patients" [lie, and libel]
"You're a known animal abuser" [lie, and libel]
"You are a criminal" [lie, and libel]
You are a thief" [lie, and libel]
Need any more reminders, short bus?
Gosh, Doc, you sure ask some dumb questions ;)
Don't I though? LOL! |
| Quote: | I just posted some text where johnnie said he was and was not programmer
within a few lines in the same post.
Four days later he denied saying it.
|
What ELSE is new?
| Quote: |
I've quoted him, been called a liar for making things up and had to post the
link where he said it.
Johnnie was *adamant* about his Book of Mormon dates and when I proved him
wrong, claimed he didn't remember the right date.
He always pulls that tactic, Mike. He knows he's a pathological liar, |
but refuses to admit it.
\Typical narcissist/
| Quote: | I'd say at least once a day he tells somebody he is not interested in or
done with them, then he forgets and responds to their next post.
Easily. But of course, knowing he needs all the attention he can |
garner, it would drive him to distraction not having his narcissistic
supply filled with attention, whether good or bad.
| Quote: | I've told him to park it, but it hardly seems wirth while to remind him of
something as he forgets the reminders.
Yes he does ---- very conveniently so. |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:41:53 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
I should remove my head and shoulders from my colon (get my
head out of my ass) before I attack people for saying things I
can't understand.
|
When do you plan to start? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 11:57:30 -0700, "Mike Painter"
<mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
| Quote: | DOC wrote:
On Thu, 14 Aug 2008 07:58:58 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
Here say (especially from the KOOKS like you here in
Usenet) is not EVIDENCE.
That's HEARSAY, O wannabe wordsmith.........
And had johnnie spent a few minutes with a search engine before yapping he
might not have made such a blanket statement.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hearsay_in_United_States_law
And johnnie claims an attorney told him he had a brillaint grasp of the law.
Yeah, sure he does! |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 12:41:46 -0700, john w <j<no>@yahoo.com> wrote:
| Quote: |
So you go ahead and "report me to SSI" or "report me to SSDI", and
they're gonna say, "John Weatherly" WHO?"
|
Yet in other posts, you claimed "At least I'M KNOWN, being a
professional journalist and writer. If anyone asked who you were, they
would have no idea. But just say John Weatherly, and they WOULD know
ME."
More effervescent bs--- |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Robibnikoff
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Better to have a Schipperke or John Weatherly? You decid |
|
|
"john w @yahoo.com>" <j<no> wailed:
| Quote: |
God is EXTREMELY concerned that everyone know where I was stationed,
when, and what sorts of birds I worked on!! Earth-shaking stuff!
|
LOL! What a load of bullshit.
--
Robyn
Resident Witchypoo
BAAWA Knight
#1557 |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mike Painter
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:12:54 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:35:06 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
.
And, like Al Capone, if you don't declare the income, you can go to
jail.
?? ^^^ LOL!! You are now comparing me to Al Capone?
Only in one respect as he was an intelligent man.
Ouch! I believe you just put me down! And that's without you even
seeing my IQ test scores!
:-(
I mean, if I can't find a way to win your approval, I'll just DIE!
:-(
Thery sent him to jail for not declaring income.
Yeah, that $.50 he got paid for shining shoes, got him 10 YEARS.
As far as IRS is concerned, my $75 twice a year (or so) is hardly
what they "come after you" for.
But you keep believing otherwise, and-- by ALL means-- contact IRS
and SSI or SSDI about me.
snicker.
Snicker indeed. Aparently for christians such as John right and wrong is |
determined by what you can get away with.
| Quote: | ANY brain, ANY sense I had given you before now,
Whoooooooooooooooosh! It'd gone.
-------------------------- ARCHIVED -----------------------
If you had a BRAIN (you don't), your next OBVIOUS question would
have been,
"How can you make any money if you are only getting $75 to build a
computer?"
Well, it's $75 I have that I wouldn't have if I hadn't built it.
" But, why would ANYBODY build a computer for $75 profit?"
It's fun, and it's something to do that keeps me out of here and
away from self-worshipping MORONS like you.
But clearly it does not as you are here.
(don't open my posts)
|
I'm not the one telling people how "building" a computer keeps you away from
here.
<snip>
| Quote: | It's the law but again, thanks for playing. The next time a person
interested in Christianity comes along we can point him to you.
He'll end up saying what my father always said. "I've seen to many
Christians."
I have never called myself "perfect." I have never called myself "a
perfect Christian." I don't know any of those.
I wouldn't want to.
The only perfect person I know at the moment would be... Hmmm...
You.
|
Perfection has nothing to do with the simple act of being honest and law
abiding. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
DOC
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 12:02 am Post subject: Re: Better to have a Schipperke or John Weatherly? You deci |
|
|
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 15:07:54 -0700 (PDT), "<Kelly>"
<316kcbk@gmail.com> wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 18, 2:53 pm, ujb <u...@bigfoot.com> wrote:
poor poor stupid is like a schipperke chasing it's tail!
Not at all - Schipperke's are nice, cute, loyal and smart...
but like poor poor stupid, no tail!
Ah, yes. Still, the Schipperke has positive characteristics that are
so *unlike* JW, that I still don't think the comparison works. For
instance, the Schipperke:
Is one of the most dynamic, intense, and curious of all breeds
Is quick-moving and agile and thrives on athletic activites and
interactive games
Makes an extremely keen watchdog
Is hardy, healthy
Now here are some traits of the Schipperke that *do* fit JW:
Destructiveness when bored or left alone too much
Suspiciousness toward strangers
Aggression toward other animals -- strong chasing instincts
Escape attempts and running away
Strong-willed mind of his own, requiring a confident owner who can
take charge
Lots of barking
Shedding
Slowness to housebreak
(I swear, I didn't make any of that up ;-)
So, as you can see, it's kind of a toss-up. While JW doesn't posess
any of the positive characteristics of the breed, he does possess the
negative traits. Then again, he doesn't possess the positive traits
of a human either, but definitely possesses the negatvie traits of
humankind. So, the only conclusion one can make is...
...better off to have a non-housetrained, tail-less Schipperke in your
home than JW.
;-)
I'll take the Schipperke, thanks. Put weatherless in the pound! |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Mike Painter
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:22 am Post subject: Re: Will John W take the challenge to provide a link he says |
|
|
| Quote: | x-no-archive: yes
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 18:27:44 -0700, "Mike Painter"
mddotpainter@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
© 2008 John D Weatherly all rights reserved; no portion of this post
may be used anywhere else without written permission of the author.
snip
And, stupid person, as I said before, if you call using the "pig
latin" version of UNIX "programming," fine. I was a programmer.
I don't call the "pig latin" version of UNIX (it was called "PRIME"
back then) "programming."
If you want to call that language SUBSTITUTE (you probably know the
name of the "pig latin" version of PRIME, if you thought about it)
If that's what you want to call "programming," OK!
According to you, I was a programmer for several months.
Absolutely ABSURD.
And as I have stated UNIX was not used on Prime computers.
Oh? Well, pal, as I have stated, I don't read your every word. So
this is the first time I've seen that statement.
And I called it "UNIX" as a generic term. I'm aware that the PRIME
was BEFORE the UNIX, and that the UNIX was based on the PRIME
language.
|
Completely and totally wrong.
You know the words but don't know how to use them.
Using UNIX as a generic term is like using Medcedes 300D as a generic for
automobile.
Prime was NOT before UNIX
UNIX is an operating system used to run computers.
Prime was a computer, not a language.
There was no Prime language
Prime used FORTRAN and Modula-2, both languages, to build an operating
system.
| Quote: |
As usual, you get hung in the minute DETAIL when I'm trying to get to
a point.
These are not minute details, they are something that even a casual user of |
a system would know.
| Quote: |
You want others (me ) to "play nice", but you won't. (play nice)
Whatever the language was used on the PRIME, I was using a
"short-cut" version, but I was able to "program" the menu on the
computer.
|
There are no "Short cut versions" of either language. Ther was no need for
them. Programmers were cheap and memory was expensive.
| Quote: | I worked with the system programmer, he would give me a hint or two
as I worked, and I "programmed" the menu.
No big deal. I didn't work on any FUNCTION other than the menu.
Why they would hire me (a WRITER) to program the menu, I have no
idea.
No one does, but you claimed you did it and you also claimed you "debugged" |
another system.
| Quote: |
snip
You should have said that when you gacve us specific dates for your
imagined changes.
^ ^ ^ ^ "suit yourself."
Does it occur to you, stupid person, that I thought I was right at
the time?
|
You always think you are right.
<snip>
| Quote: |
I didn't give you "specific dates", liar. I GUESSED, and said so.
IF you said so it was well after my showing you that the dates you
stated were wrong.
Yeah. So? So I didn't notice your "input" immediately. I have a
life, and you haven't been EXACTLY friendly.
|
You responded to my input several times before you decided that your very
specific references to dates and places were wrong.
| Quote: |
***************************************************
"Well, at least this should be an easy one for you to "prove". All
you need to do is get a copy of the BoM edition which has
'Bethelem'[sic] replacing 'Jerusalem', state which edition it is,
and scan the relevant pages.
John replies,
" ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^Done, done, done, and done.
Perhaps, just PERHAPS, I didn't entirely DIGEST your comment before
responding.
|
Perhaps, but it was not my comment and *you* stated *you* had scanned teh
pages and just needed help with a web site.
| Quote: |
I mean, this "argument" is getting VERY old. It's growing cobwebs.
|
There is no argument. You made a claim and I proved you wrong.
You then claimed you guessed at teh dates and I quioted what you said.
What were the "correct" dates? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
