| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ananda
Guest
|
 Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 5:22 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
 |
|
"cupcake" <t@r.slrup> wrote
| Quote: | well, Evvie, since you and Ananda are so intent on revealing
the contents of Vajra Headquarter's (in Dharmasala) dossier
on Tang -- why don't you and Ananda tell us all what it
is that the Vajra Intelligence Network knows about
Pete "bhava" "cupcake" Hooper, then, too, 'kay
|
All the information revealed here are public information. we didn't reveal
personal information here. The picture of tang was obtained from a website.
If Tang doesn't want his photo to be published then he should take this up
with the website owner.
So is the ISP address. The data was obtained through the postmark of the
sender and it was checked using the domain registration search. This is
perfectly legal and there is no basis for Ken , Denise or Ardie to complaint
about either.Only thing they should do is to behave themselves when writing
in public domain. Otherwise then they should use personal email than public
forum/usenet to convey their ideas or thoughts. |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Ananda
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 5:25 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
"karma nygou" <ky@uho.con> wrote
| Quote: | blush
shucks
i bet u say that to all the chumps
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck who wuda thot
they'd figure out
this is dancing queen
fuck i did it again
they're catching on
all of my songs
ar really abba
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
and chew gum
fuck i'll just change my name
how bout tina
tina agulara
fuck it did work before
maybe no can tell
i'm brittney spears
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
and chew gum
fuck i did it again
|
If this is really Dar, then he is posting this not far from where you are
staying Eve. NYC.
Registrant:
Mediacom Communications Corporation (MCHSI2-DOM)
100 Crystal Run Rd
Middletown, NY 10941
US |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ch'an Fu
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 5:50 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
Ananda wrote:
| Quote: | "karma nygou" <ky@uho.con> wrote
blush
shucks
i bet u say that to all the chumps
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck who wuda thot
they'd figure out
this is dancing queen
fuck i did it again
they're catching on
all of my songs
ar really abba
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
and chew gum
fuck i'll just change my name
how bout tina
tina agulara
fuck it did work before
maybe no can tell
i'm brittney spears
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
and chew gum
fuck i did it again
If this is really Dar, then he is posting this not far from where you are
staying Eve. NYC.
Registrant:
Mediacom Communications Corporation (MCHSI2-DOM)
100 Crystal Run Rd
Middletown, NY 10941
US
|
there's stupid and STUPID, and *you*,
my ignorant little singaporean nazi,
may be up for the king-size trophy.
congratulations on finding two ISP media
headquarters in one day and assuming
that people post from them. you sure
as hell have a chronic affinity for evelyn.
mebbe dar will bother to slice your
fascist baloney into hors d'ouvres, but i'd
bet it's not worth the trouble... |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
karma nygou
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:16 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:50:05 -0400, Ch'an Fu
<chanfu@removeyoursandals.metta.lk> wrote:
| Quote: | Ananda wrote:
"karma nygou" <ky@uho.con> wrote
blush
shucks
i bet u say that to all the chumps
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck who wuda thot
they'd figure out
this is dancing queen
fuck i did it again
they're catching on
all of my songs
ar really abba
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
and chew gum
fuck i'll just change my name
how bout tina
tina agulara
fuck it did work before
maybe no can tell
i'm brittney spears
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
and chew gum
fuck i did it again
If this is really Dar, then he is posting this not far from where you are
staying Eve. NYC.
Registrant:
Mediacom Communications Corporation (MCHSI2-DOM)
100 Crystal Run Rd
Middletown, NY 10941
US
there's stupid and STUPID, and *you*,
my ignorant little singaporean nazi,
may be up for the king-size trophy.
congratulations on finding two ISP media
headquarters in one day and assuming
that people post from them. you sure
as hell have a chronic affinity for evelyn.
mebbe dar will bother to slice your
fascist baloney into hors d'ouvres, but i'd
bet it's not worth the trouble...
|
naw he's one of those fatassed rush types
that assume since all they do is blow
smoke out their own ass and sniff it
that everyones lse does too
not worth the effort never was
its amazing though how useless
dnslookup has become
i guess with nothing bein centralized anymore
nothins correct cuz nobody bothers to change it
funny i went to change servers for some posts
and it was already att which is showin up as mediacom
becuase of couse neither exist anymore and
either of those should be reading comcast
but go figure, nobody does their jobs
cuz if it not centralized whos' to say
but if people wanna think dns is authoritive
fine go ahead, im mean the quads shud be correct
but aliases alaiii? they could be anyhting
try on a number of dns servers
they wont be all the same
for registration that is |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ch'an Fu
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:27 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
karma nygou wrote:
| Quote: | On Mon, 23 Jun 2003 20:50:05 -0400, Ch'an Fu
chanfu@removeyoursandals.metta.lk> wrote:
Ananda wrote:
"karma nygou" <ky@uho.con> wrote
blush
shucks
i bet u say that to all the chumps
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck who wuda thot
they'd figure out
this is dancing queen
fuck i did it again
they're catching on
all of my songs
ar really abba
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
and chew gum
fuck i'll just change my name
how bout tina
tina agulara
fuck it did work before
maybe no can tell
i'm brittney spears
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
while chewing gum
fuck i did it again
tryin to walk
and chew gum
fuck i did it again
If this is really Dar, then he is posting this not far from where you are
staying Eve. NYC.
Registrant:
Mediacom Communications Corporation (MCHSI2-DOM)
100 Crystal Run Rd
Middletown, NY 10941
US
there's stupid and STUPID, and *you*,
my ignorant little singaporean nazi,
may be up for the king-size trophy.
congratulations on finding two ISP media
headquarters in one day and assuming
that people post from them. you sure
as hell have a chronic affinity for evelyn.
mebbe dar will bother to slice your
fascist baloney into hors d'ouvres, but i'd
bet it's not worth the trouble...
naw he's one of those fatassed rush types
that assume since all they do is blow
smoke out their own ass and sniff it
that everyones lse does too
not worth the effort never was
its amazing though how useless
dnslookup has become
i guess with nothing bein centralized anymore
nothins correct cuz nobody bothers to change it
funny i went to change servers for some posts
and it was already att which is showin up as mediacom
becuase of couse neither exist anymore and
either of those should be reading comcast
but go figure, nobody does their jobs
cuz if it not centralized whos' to say
but if people wanna think dns is authoritive
fine go ahead, im mean the quads shud be correct
but aliases alaiii? they could be anyhting
try on a number of dns servers
they wont be all the same
for registration that is
|
sho 'nuff br'er rabbit
all outta synch
digital anarchy. wanna T-shirt?
got one left.
tinks all happy gets to walk now
toss him out on the grass like
a football.and he strolls around
before he figgers out that
there's something in the sky
lookin at him an runs back.
hows the chickens? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Lee Dillion
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:33 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
George W. Cherry wrote:
| Quote: | It would be best to move on. Since Tang still
works at B.U., perhaps the greatest harm
has been to the atmosphere of these news-
groups. I for one take the vow that I will
always confine my disagreements strictly to
my posts to the newsgroups. (That has al-
so been my entire past behavior.)
|
For that you are to be applauded.
--
Lee Dillion |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
LongDang
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:44 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
Tang Huyen wrote in message <3EF6D133.8AF947DA@yahoo.com>...
| Quote: |
Evelyn Ruut wrote:
Cupcake, you are kidding yourself. I got it from the BU site
long ago, and
his name was right there with the photo. It said Tang Huyen.
You trying
to tell me that his own boss put a fake photo up there with
his name? It
stayed there for a LONG time! Don't be such a twerp. It's
Tang.
Odd.
Just last evening, less than twelve hours ago, you said in this
very same
thread:
I happen to have a photo of Tang, sent to me by one of his
admirers some
time ago. Anyone wants a copy I will be thrilled to send it
along.
So, did you get it from the BU web site, *or* did somebody send
it to you? If
the latter, who was it?
|
Mr.BuddhaTang...You Have Become Quite The Celebrity...Send Me A
Pic...With Your Autograph....!
Thanks...Your Number One Fan...LongDang...! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Pema
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:49 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
Ch'an Fu <chanfu@removeyoursandals.metta.lk> wrote in message news:<3EF78355.2AEF3252@removeyoursandals.metta.lk>...
| Quote: | Evelyn Ruut wrote:
"Ch'an Fu" <chanfu@removeyoursandals.metta.lk> wrote in message
news:3EF76077.C57FDE21@removeyoursandals.metta.lk...
"George W. Cherry" wrote:
"Ch'an Fu" <chanfu@removeyoursandals.metta.lk> wrote in message
Well, I'm sure that they all dream about you, one way or the other.
It seems that your boss acted irresponsibly and you might have
been more careful. But since the image was once public, and you didn't
protest, I don't know if there's much that can be done about its
distribution at this point.
I think you oughta get legal advice on this important subject.
However, the ethics of sending it (and who knows what other personal
information about you) to people via unsolicited email are despicable
in the extreme - tactics that appear to have continued "for a LONG
time".
Unless Jen or others identify the distributor as Evelyn, the
evidence (of her 'campaign') is still only circumstantial.
Ananda also received the picture - perhaps (s)he will reveal where it
came from and the circumstances under which (s)he received it.
Whether one of the recipients will have the integrity to expose
the source is the next question.
Wow! This is serious, isn't it!
To me, George, most matters of ethics are
'serious' since they involve trust as well as
integrity. I'm sure that by now, everyone has some
suspicions in the case of the threats to Tang a
while back that actually involved his employer.
The entire purpose of the exercise was to harm him
for his criticism of the Tibetan religion. As you
know, Evelyn also believ(s/ed) that Tang was
'stalking' her.
The case remains unsolved for lack of
substantial evidence (the actual email
to his employer or someone producing
another subversive email). But the various bits
of circumstantial evidence are available and
have been posted here before.
Though slow, the game is still in progress,
and though not obvious, current.
I had nothing to do with any trouble Tang had with his employer. He got
himself in trouble if that is what happened, but I had nothing to do with
it. He just got away with whatever he did for so long until someone
finally caught on. Why assume it was anyone from here in the first place?
Anyway, I never reported him to anyone for anything no matter what he did,
and he did plenty.
You have to consider that Tang has made a considerable number of enemies
here on the newsgroups and he has practically tortured quite a few people
for years on end. You should think about some of them as being possible
culprits if you can call them that, since he hassled so many people for so
long you could probably call it retaliation or karma, or action/reaction.
He just hassled me the worst and the longest so he automatically assumes it
was me.
Well, that's understandable. You're the Hindenburg
as far as e go's.
I assure you that if I did it I would tell you straight out.
We've been through your habitual liar stuff
before, Evelyn. Why would I believe it now,
simply because you repeat it?
In fact whoever did do it, I say bravo to them, but it still wasn't me. Too
bad
you waste your time blaming me when the real person has gotten away scot
free! I guarantee you that if the real person suddenly identified
themself, ten people would pat him or her on the back! That is assuming
that his boss didn't simply just catch him doing something wrong on his own
and nobody actually told on him......
But I haven't 'blamed' you yet - not enough evidence.
Don't mistake insinuation for conviction.
So, you didn't have the guts, but you cheer for
someone who did? Is that any different from doing
it yourself (gutlessness aside)? No one "caught on"
to anything. He was accused and the accusation fell
on deaf ears.
So where are these other 11 people? (the
"real person" plus 10 who are also gutless)
Which one is Judas?
How many people and who have you emailed,
asking for my personal information (where I live,
my affiliations, etc.), Evelyn?
|
wow...so you guys think ev is out to get you, and spends offline
time conducting campians against you. ahhh...can you read this again
and tell me what sounds weird about this?
btw, ev never said she would pat anyone on the back. she said 10
people would.
must i come on every week to straighten out your missing the bleeding
obvious? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ch'an Fu
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 6:52 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
Ananda wrote:
| Quote: | "Ch'an Fu" <chanfu@removeyoursandals.metta.lk> wrote
there's stupid and STUPID, and *you*,
my ignorant little singaporean nazi,
may be up for the king-size trophy.
congratulations on finding two ISP media
headquarters in one day and assuming
that people post from them. you sure
as hell have a chronic affinity for evelyn.
mebbe dar will bother to slice your
fascist baloney into hors d'ouvres, but i'd
bet it's not worth the trouble...
My goodness. This is a public domain. I only publish public information. Why
you are showing off your nazi, racist bigotry character to everyone here. I
didn't steal this information from anyone private mail and publish it. You
are having problem with that? If you do then you should leave this publuic
domain and convey your thought privately. We don't need to know your narrow
minded uncivilised post here anymore than we need Kenny, Ardie or Denise who
post under fake names. They are the ones who should be ashamed of their
actions
|
quite a trip there, cutie.  |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
cupcake
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 7:04 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
| Quote: |
Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important)
From: "Ananda" <chinsoo@singnet.com.sg
Reply to: [1]"Ananda"
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 08:22:39 +0800
Organization: Singapore Telecommunications Ltd
Newsgroups:
[2]talk.religion.buddhism,
[3]alt.zen,
[4]alt.religion.buddhism.tibetan
Followup to: [5]newsgroups
References:
[6]<GFCJa.25660$1n.20284@twister.nyroc.rr.com
[7]<hHEJa.861$T65.8727@news.more.net
"cupcake" <t@r.slrup> wrote
well, Evvie, since you and Ananda are so intent on revealing
the contents of Vajra Headquarter's (in Dharmasala) dossier
on Tang -- why don't you and Ananda tell us all what it
is that the Vajra Intelligence Network knows about
Pete "bhava" "cupcake" Hooper, then, too, 'kay
All the information revealed here are public information. we didn't reveal
personal information here. The picture of tang was obtained from a website.
If Tang doesn't want his photo to be published then he should take this up
with the website owner.
So is the ISP address. The data was obtained through the postmark of the
sender and it was checked using the domain registration search. This is
perfectly legal and there is no basis for Ken , Denise or Ardie to complaint
about either.Only thing they should do is to behave themselves when writing
in public domain. Otherwise then they should use personal email than public
forum/usenet to convey their ideas or thoughts.
|
the point is, yu little shit head, that both yu and evvie,
and all yer little vajra friends, are a bunch'a viscious
fascist vajra storm troopers! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
cupcake
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 7:08 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
| Quote: |
Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important)
From: "LongDang" <LongDang1@hotmail.com
Reply to: [1]"LongDang"
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 21:44:57 -0400
Newsgroups:
[2]talk.religion.buddhism,
[3]alt.zen,
[4]alt.religion.buddhism.tibetan
Followup to: [5]newsgroups
References:
[6]<3EF6446F.C5765752@removeyoursandals.metta.lk
[7]<6IrJa.850$T65.9205@news.more.net
[8]<yXzJa.24221$1n.17870@twister.nyroc.rr.com
[9]<3EF6D133.8AF947DA@yahoo.com
Tang Huyen wrote in message <3EF6D133.8AF947DA@yahoo.com>...
Evelyn Ruut wrote:
Cupcake, you are kidding yourself. I got it from the BU site
long ago, and
his name was right there with the photo. It said Tang Huyen.
You trying
to tell me that his own boss put a fake photo up there with
his name? It
stayed there for a LONG time! Don't be such a twerp. It's
Tang.
Odd.
Just last evening, less than twelve hours ago, you said in this
very same
thread:
I happen to have a photo of Tang, sent to me by one of his
admirers some
time ago. Anyone wants a copy I will be thrilled to send it
along.
So, did you get it from the BU web site, *or* did somebody send
it to you? If
the latter, who was it?
Mr.BuddhaTang...You Have Become Quite The Celebrity...Send Me A
Pic...With Your Autograph....!
Thanks...Your Number One Fan...LongDang...!
|
well, then, i guess, now, yer starting to understand why
we call him His High Most Excellency, then, huh |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ananda
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 7:09 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
"cupcake" <t@r.slrup> wrote
| Quote: |
the point is, yu little shit head, that both yu and evvie,
and all yer little vajra friends, are a bunch'a viscious
fascist vajra storm troopers!
|
If the HHDL is part of the troopers , then thanks for the compliments
cuppie. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
cupcake
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 7:14 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
| Quote: |
Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important)
From: "Ananda" <chinsoo@singnet.com.sg
Reply to: [1]"Ananda"
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 10:09:53 +0800
Organization: Singapore Telecommunications Ltd
Newsgroups:
[2]talk.religion.buddhism,
[3]alt.zen,
[4]alt.religion.buddhism.tibetan
Followup to: [5]newsgroups
References:
[6]<bd84nc$84c$1@reader01.singnet.com.sg
[7]<pkOJa.874$T65.8489@news.more.net
"cupcake" <t@r.slrup> wrote
the point is, yu little shit head, that both yu and evvie,
and all yer little vajra friends, are a bunch'a viscious
fascist vajra storm troopers!
If the HHDL is part of the troopers , then thanks for the compliments
cuppie.
|
well the Dalai Lama is certainly being held accountable for
all of yu peoples' mis-deeds, because he is the one who is
fostering this whole atmosphere, throughout Tibetan
Vajrayanism! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Meandwarf
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 7:22 am Post subject: Re: The unreal thing (was Re: The Real Thing) |
|
|
| Quote: | "BWZ" <bwz@fake.com> wrote in message
news:3ef51ecd$0$30568$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
Scubbing the bathtub or posting on a newsgroup - it's all the same.
There's
no enlightenment to be found, and nobody to find it.
Sean
|
--
it's all good
"BWZ" <bwz@fake.email.com> wrote in message
news:3ef77a7b$0$30568$afc38c87@news.optusnet.com.au...
| Quote: | Get enlightened and I'll be happy.
Sean
"Robert J Bullock" <robert@rjbullock.com> wrote in message
news:t4EJa.26305$1n.3687@twister.nyroc.rr.com...
Ah stop it Robert you're depressing me your so damn desperate for
enlightenment.
Sorry about that, dude. What can I say to cheer you up?
--
R.J. Bullock
Binghamton, NY
"An intellectual says something simple in a difficult way;
an artist says something difficult in a simple way."
- Charles Bukowski
|
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Ch'an Fu
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Jun 24, 2003 7:39 am Post subject: Re: Invasive tactics (was Re: The important) |
|
|
Pema wrote:
| Quote: | Ch'an Fu <chanfu@removeyoursandals.metta.lk> wrote in message news:<3EF78355.2AEF3252@removeyoursandals.metta.lk>...
Evelyn Ruut wrote:
"Ch'an Fu" <chanfu@removeyoursandals.metta.lk> wrote in message
news:3EF76077.C57FDE21@removeyoursandals.metta.lk...
"George W. Cherry" wrote:
"Ch'an Fu" <chanfu@removeyoursandals.metta.lk> wrote in message
Well, I'm sure that they all dream about you, one way or the other.
It seems that your boss acted irresponsibly and you might have
been more careful. But since the image was once public, and you didn't
protest, I don't know if there's much that can be done about its
distribution at this point.
I think you oughta get legal advice on this important subject.
However, the ethics of sending it (and who knows what other personal
information about you) to people via unsolicited email are despicable
in the extreme - tactics that appear to have continued "for a LONG
time".
Unless Jen or others identify the distributor as Evelyn, the
evidence (of her 'campaign') is still only circumstantial.
Ananda also received the picture - perhaps (s)he will reveal where it
came from and the circumstances under which (s)he received it.
Whether one of the recipients will have the integrity to expose
the source is the next question.
Wow! This is serious, isn't it!
To me, George, most matters of ethics are
'serious' since they involve trust as well as
integrity. I'm sure that by now, everyone has some
suspicions in the case of the threats to Tang a
while back that actually involved his employer.
The entire purpose of the exercise was to harm him
for his criticism of the Tibetan religion. As you
know, Evelyn also believ(s/ed) that Tang was
'stalking' her.
The case remains unsolved for lack of
substantial evidence (the actual email
to his employer or someone producing
another subversive email). But the various bits
of circumstantial evidence are available and
have been posted here before.
Though slow, the game is still in progress,
and though not obvious, current.
I had nothing to do with any trouble Tang had with his employer. He got
himself in trouble if that is what happened, but I had nothing to do with
it. He just got away with whatever he did for so long until someone
finally caught on. Why assume it was anyone from here in the first place?
Anyway, I never reported him to anyone for anything no matter what he did,
and he did plenty.
You have to consider that Tang has made a considerable number of enemies
here on the newsgroups and he has practically tortured quite a few people
for years on end. You should think about some of them as being possible
culprits if you can call them that, since he hassled so many people for so
long you could probably call it retaliation or karma, or action/reaction.
He just hassled me the worst and the longest so he automatically assumes it
was me.
Well, that's understandable. You're the Hindenburg
as far as e go's.
I assure you that if I did it I would tell you straight out.
We've been through your habitual liar stuff
before, Evelyn. Why would I believe it now,
simply because you repeat it?
In fact whoever did do it, I say bravo to them, but it still wasn't me. Too
bad
you waste your time blaming me when the real person has gotten away scot
free! I guarantee you that if the real person suddenly identified
themself, ten people would pat him or her on the back! That is assuming
that his boss didn't simply just catch him doing something wrong on his own
and nobody actually told on him......
But I haven't 'blamed' you yet - not enough evidence.
Don't mistake insinuation for conviction.
So, you didn't have the guts, but you cheer for
someone who did? Is that any different from doing
it yourself (gutlessness aside)? No one "caught on"
to anything. He was accused and the accusation fell
on deaf ears.
So where are these other 11 people? (the
"real person" plus 10 who are also gutless)
Which one is Judas?
How many people and who have you emailed,
asking for my personal information (where I live,
my affiliations, etc.), Evelyn?
wow...so you guys think ev is out to get you, and spends offline
time conducting campians against you. ahhh...can you read this again
and tell me what sounds weird about this?
btw, ev never said she would pat anyone on the back. she said 10
people would.
must i come on every week to straighten out your missing the bleeding
obvious?
|
"btw, ev never said she would pat anyone on the back"
-- pema
"In fact whoever did do it, I say bravo to them"
-- evelyn
Hope her arm's not broken from patting
herself on the back, and that you learn to read.
As for the last question,
"How many people and who have you emailed,
asking for my personal information (where I live,
my affiliations, etc.), Evelyn?"
She can answer it herself. If she can't, I can.
Is this all some vajrayana visualization exercise
where you reinforce each other's hallucinations
or what? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
