| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
 Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 6:10 pm Post subject: Re: 'ARISE ARJUN HOUR' RADIO SHOW |
 |
|
On Aug 10, 1:48 pm, hari.ku...@indero.com wrote:
| Quote: | I deplore fundamentalist bigots of all religions, why should those among
hindus be any different? =A0Do you join me in damning hindu and all
other
fundamentalist bigots? =A0If you do you also damn jay stevens,aka dr.
jai
etc. as the white religious bigot he is.
"I see that you are back to making senseless noises. You are a stupid fool
if you think that your idiotic rants in support of your missionaries will
find any takers. All that you are doing is exposing your stupidity to the
world over and over again."
My statement was very clear and was specific and to the point about
bigotry. Your answer is equally revealing as to your refusing to stand
against bigotry whereever it rases its evil head.
|
You are a Muslim asshole and invented a POPE for Hindus. tbj.blue is
right about your stupidity! |
|
| |
|
 Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Sun Aug 10, 2008 10:05 pm Post subject: Re: 'ARISE ARJUN HOUR' RADIO SHOW |
|
|
| Quote: | I deplore fundamentalist bigots of all religions, why should those
amon= |
g
| Quote: | hindus be any different? =3DA0Do you join me in damning hindu and all
other
fundamentalist bigots? =3DA0If you do you also damn jay stevens,aka
dr.
jai
etc. as the white religious bigot he is.
"I see that you are back to making senseless noises. You are a stupid
foo= |
l
| Quote: | if you think that your idiotic rants in support of your missionaries
will
find any takers. All that you are doing is exposing your stupidity to
the
world over and over again."
My statement was very clear and was specific and to the point about
bigotry. =A0Your answer is equally revealing as to your refusing to
stand
against bigotry whereever it rases its evil head.
|
"You are a Muslim asshole and invented a POPE for Hindus. tbj.blue is
right about your stupidity!"
Oh great elevated pope of all hindus. I am unworthy to invent such an
august personage as yourself.
Do you join me in damning all bigotry whereever it raises its evil head? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 3:01 am Post subject: Re: 'ARISE ARJUN HOUR' RADIO SHOW |
|
|
On Aug 10, 6:05 pm, hari.ku...@indero.com wrote:
| Quote: | I deplore fundamentalist bigots of all religions, why should those
amon> g> > hindus be any different? =3DA0Do you join me in damning hindu and all
other
fundamentalist bigots? =3DA0If you do you also damn jay stevens,aka
dr.
jai
etc. as the white religious bigot he is.
"I see that you are back to making senseless noises. You are a stupid
foo> l
if you think that your idiotic rants in support of your missionaries
will
find any takers. All that you are doing is exposing your stupidity to
the
world over and over again."
My statement was very clear and was specific and to the point about
bigotry. =A0Your answer is equally revealing as to your refusing to
stand
against bigotry whereever it rases its evil head.
"You are a Muslim asshole and invented a POPE for Hindus. tbj.blue is
right about your stupidity!"
Oh great elevated pope of all hindus. I am unworthy to invent such an
august personage as yourself.
Do you join me in damning all bigotry whereever it raises its evil head?
|
You are a bigot and refuse to talk about you Islamic crimes here. You
are a stupid and try to degrade Hindus only! |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
tbj.blue@yahoo.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 4:22 am Post subject: Re: 'ARISE ARJUN HOUR' RADIO SHOW |
|
|
On Aug 11, 3:05 am, hari.ku...@indero.com wrote:
| Quote: | I deplore fundamentalist bigots of all religions, why should those
amon> g> > hindus be any different? =3DA0Do you join me in damning hindu and all
other
fundamentalist bigots? =3DA0If you do you also damn jay stevens,aka
dr.
jai
etc. as the white religious bigot he is.
"I see that you are back to making senseless noises. You are a stupid
foo> l
if you think that your idiotic rants in support of your missionaries
will
find any takers. All that you are doing is exposing your stupidity to
the
world over and over again."
My statement was very clear and was specific and to the point about
bigotry. =A0Your answer is equally revealing as to your refusing to
stand
against bigotry whereever it rases its evil head.
"You are a Muslim asshole and invented a POPE for Hindus. tbj.blue is
right about your stupidity!"
Oh great elevated pope of all hindus. I am unworthy to invent such an
august personage as yourself.
Do you join me in damning all bigotry whereever it raises its evil head?
|
Join us in damning the Bible then?
http://www.evilbible.com
Join us in damning the Koran as well?
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/cruelty/long.html
Does Golwalkar's idea of reducing the venom of ideologies hostile to
Hinduism through assimilation, come anywhere near the depraved
'divine' messages of the Bible or the Koran in terms of hatred or
hostility?
Let us see what new form of weasel behaviour you show now. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:45 am Post subject: Re: 'ARISE ARJUN HOUR' RADIO SHOW |
|
|
"Does Golwalkar's idea of reducing the venom of ideologies hostile to
Hinduism through assimilation, come anywhere near the depraved 'divine'
messages of the Bible or the Koran in terms of hatred or hostility?
Let us see what new form of weasel behaviour you show now."
I damn any example of bigitry whereever it is found. Do you join me in
this also? Would saying that person over there is a bigot excuse same in
yourself? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
tbj.blue@yahoo.com
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 11:52 am Post subject: Re: 'ARISE ARJUN HOUR' RADIO SHOW |
|
|
On Aug 11, 4:45 pm, hari.ku...@indero.com wrote:
| Quote: | "Does Golwalkar's idea of reducing the venom of ideologies hostile to
Hinduism through assimilation, come anywhere near the depraved 'divine'
messages of the Bible or the Koran in terms of hatred or hostility?
Let us see what new form of weasel behaviour you show now."
I damn any example of bigitry whereever it is found.
|
No, you don't, weasel. You never have damned anything other than
assertive Hinduism.
Show us evidence of your claims to hate anything other than Hinduism,
weasel. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 12:05 pm Post subject: Re: 'ARISE ARJUN HOUR' RADIO SHOW |
|
|
| Quote: | "You are a Muslim asshole and invented a POPE for Hindus. tbj.blue is
right about your stupidity!"
Oh great elevated pope of all hindus. =A0I am unworthy to invent such an
august personage as yourself.
Do you join me in damning all bigotry whereever it raises its evil head?
|
"You are a bigot and refuse to talk about you Islamic crimes here. You are
a stupid and try to degrade Hindus only!"
I damn bigitry in all places by anyone, can great elevated enlightened
pope of all hindus join me in this statement? I am unworthy, I am no
doubt confused that pope of all hindus must have some hidden wisdom not
yet revealed that prevents him from also damning bigitry as clearly. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 1:58 pm Post subject: Re: 'ARISE ARJUN HOUR' RADIO SHOW |
|
|
On Aug 11, 8:05 am, hari.ku...@indero.com wrote:
| Quote: | "You are a Muslim asshole and invented a POPE for Hindus. tbj.blue is
right about your stupidity!"
Oh great elevated pope of all hindus. =A0I am unworthy to invent such an
august personage as yourself.
Do you join me in damning all bigotry whereever it raises its evil head?
"You are a bigot and refuse to talk about you Islamic crimes here. You are
a stupid and try to degrade Hindus only!"
I damn bigitry in all places by anyone, can great elevated enlightened
pope of all hindus join me in this statement? I am unworthy, I am no
doubt confused that pope of all hindus must have some hidden wisdom not
yet revealed that prevents him from also damning bigitry as clearly.
|
Come out with your Islamic/Christian bigotry, then we can discuss them
but you never come with them because you work against Hindus only. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Aug 11, 2008 2:39 pm Post subject: Re: 'ARISE ARJUN HOUR' RADIO SHOW |
|
|
"Come out with your Islamic/Christian bigotry, then we can discuss them
but you never come with them because you work against Hindus only."
Oh dear great enlightened glorious elevated pope of all hindus, I am
unworthy. I make many mistakes in words, I do not have the tonge of the
godsas do you and my meaning is unclear. Please pope of all hindus, allow
me to try again.
I damn all bigitry by any pperson of any group. Can pope of all hindus
now feel at ease to say same? Does pope of all hindus have some not yet
revealed wisdom that prevents him from joining my unworthy self in making
this declaration? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 5:55 pm Post subject: The same "pre-existence" challenge for Goo to fail again. |
|
|
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Goo lied:
| Quote: | On Mon, 11 Aug 2008 20:43:40 -0100, dh@. wrote:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Goo wrote:
Prior to existing, there was no entity, and thus no welfare
Try explaining how you think pre-existent entities prevent
existing ones from benefitting from lives of positive value. Go:
I just did
|
No Goober, you simply made the claim without backing
it up, or even coming close. You need to explain how you
think your own pre-existence is preventing you from benefitting
from your existence now. GO:
(Correct prediction: the Goober can not meet the challenge,
and will fail completely to try to explain.)
| Quote: | (Correct prediction: the Goober can not meet the challenge,
and will fail completely to try to explain.) |
|
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Rudy Canoza
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2008 10:44 pm Post subject: Re: The same lack of *any* challenge from the incompetent bu |
|
|
Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist, stupid pig-fucking cracker -
woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was
yesterday?", and so he lied:
| Quote: | On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Rudy H. Canoza wrote:
Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist, stupid pig-fucking cracker - woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was yesterday?", and so he lied:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Rudy W. Canoza wrote:
Prior to existing, there was no entity, and thus no welfare
Try explaining
I just did explain, you fucking Stupidist. Existence is not a benefit. You wrote shit on March 22, 2005. You write shit all the time, you stupid Stupidist.
No Rudy,
|
Yes, Goo, I just did. I have proved that coming into existence -
"getting to experience life" - is not a benefit, Goo.
No challenge, Goo. You have not, do not, and never will pose *any*
challenge to me, on anything. You cannot - you are incapable of it. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Rupert
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 3:00 am Post subject: Re: The same lack of *any* challenge from the incompetent bu |
|
|
On Aug 12, 10:44 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
| Quote: | Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist, stupid pig-fucking cracker -
woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was
yesterday?", and so he lied:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Rudy H. Canoza wrote:
Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist, stupid pig-fucking cracker - woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was yesterday?", and so he lied:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Rudy W. Canoza wrote:
Prior to existing, there was no entity, and thus no welfare
Try explaining
I just did explain, you fucking Stupidist. Existence is not a benefit. You wrote shit on March 22, 2005. You write shit all the time, you stupid Stupidist.
No Rudy,
Yes, Goo, I just did. I have proved that coming into existence -
"getting to experience life" - is not a benefit, Goo.
No challenge, Goo. You have not, do not, and never will pose *any*
challenge to me, on anything. You cannot - you are incapable of it.
|
It seems to me that, rather than saying that you have met David
Harrison's challenge, you should instead reject his question, saying
that any talk of a "pre-existent state" or a "pre-existent entity" is
complete nonsense. You wouldn't want there to be any suspicion that
you think otherwise. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Rupert
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:11 am Post subject: Re: The same lack of *any* challenge from the incompetent bu |
|
|
On Aug 19, 2:35 pm, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
| Quote: | Rupert wrote:
On Aug 12, 10:44 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist, stupid pig-fucking cracker -
woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was
yesterday?", and so he lied:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Rudy H. Canoza wrote:
Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist, stupid pig-fucking cracker - woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was yesterday?", and so he lied:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Rudy W. Canoza wrote:
Prior to existing, there was no entity, and thus no welfare
Try explaining
I just did explain, you fucking Stupidist. Existence is not a benefit. You wrote shit on March 22, 2005. You write shit all the time, you stupid Stupidist.
No Rudy,
Yes, Goo, I just did. I have proved that coming into existence -
"getting to experience life" - is not a benefit, Goo.
No challenge, Goo. You have not, do not, and never will pose *any*
challenge to me, on anything. You cannot - you are incapable of it.
It seems to me that, rather than saying that you have met David
Harrison's challenge,
I didn't say that.
|
David Harrison's challenge was to explain something. You wrote "I just
did explain, you fucking Stupidist." So you did claim to have met
David Harrison's challenge. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Rupert
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 9:21 am Post subject: Re: The same lack of *any* challenge from the incompetent bu |
|
|
On Aug 19, 4:13 pm, Dutch <n...@email.com> wrote:
| Quote: | Rupert wrote:
On Aug 12, 10:44 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist, stupid pig-fucking cracker -
woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was
yesterday?", and so he lied:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Rudy H. Canoza wrote:
Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist, stupid pig-fucking cracker - woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was yesterday?", and so he lied:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Rudy W. Canoza wrote:
Prior to existing, there was no entity, and thus no welfare
Try explaining
I just did explain, you fucking Stupidist. Existence is not a benefit. You wrote shit on March 22, 2005. You write shit all the time, you stupid Stupidist.
No Rudy,
Yes, Goo, I just did. I have proved that coming into existence -
"getting to experience life" - is not a benefit, Goo.
No challenge, Goo. You have not, do not, and never will pose *any*
challenge to me, on anything. You cannot - you are incapable of it.
It seems to me that, rather than saying that you have met David
Harrison's challenge, you should instead reject his question, saying
that any talk of a "pre-existent state" or a "pre-existent entity" is
complete nonsense. You wouldn't want there to be any suspicion that
you think otherwise.
If you'd just read Salt's short essay you would
realize that it is not necessary to declare that
"pre-existence" is nonsense in order to refute the
Logic of the Larder. In fact it would be an error to
deny categorically the existence of something of which
we have absolutely no knowledge.
|
I am sure you are right that I ought to read Salt's essay. I was
actually aware that it is not necessary to declare that "pre-
existence" is nonsense in order to refute the Logic of the Larder.
However, it's not an error to declare that "pre-existence" is
nonsense, it most definitely is incoherent nonsense. It is true that
we might conceivably be immortal souls who float about in the ether
and become "attached" to biological organisms when those organisms
come into existence. (Although we shouldn't give any credence to such
a possibility when making an argument in practical ethics with real-
life applications, because there's absolutely no evidence for such a
possibility.) However, this still wouldn't alter the fact that it's
incoherent nonsense to talk of a "pre-existent state" or a "pre-
existent entity". An entity can't exist before it exists. We should
instead speak of a state which our soul is in before our body comes
into existence, or a soul existing prior to the existence of the body
to which it eventually becomes attached.
If David Harrison is allowed to make conjectures that there are souls
floating about in the ether which become attached to bodies then I
suppose he may as well be allowed to conjecture that those souls
benefit by becoming attached to bodies. Since it is all conjecture
without the slightest supporting evidence, then why not? |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
Rudy Canoza
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Aug 19, 2008 11:35 am Post subject: Re: The same lack of *any* challenge from the incompetent bu |
|
|
Rupert wrote:
| Quote: | On Aug 12, 10:44 am, Rudy Canoza <pi...@thedismalscience.noot> wrote:
Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist, stupid pig-fucking cracker -
woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was
yesterday?", and so he lied:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Rudy H. Canoza wrote:
Goo - Fuckwit David Harrison, Stupidist, stupid pig-fucking cracker - woke up and said, "How can I be even *more* stupid today than I was yesterday?", and so he lied:
On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, Rudy W. Canoza wrote:
Prior to existing, there was no entity, and thus no welfare
Try explaining
I just did explain, you fucking Stupidist. Existence is not a benefit. You wrote shit on March 22, 2005. You write shit all the time, you stupid Stupidist.
No Rudy,
Yes, Goo, I just did. I have proved that coming into existence -
"getting to experience life" - is not a benefit, Goo.
No challenge, Goo. You have not, do not, and never will pose *any*
challenge to me, on anything. You cannot - you are incapable of it.
It seems to me that, rather than saying that you have met David
Harrison's challenge,
|
I didn't say that. |
|
| |
|
| Back to top |
|
